Text Model Leaderboard
Combine overall conclusions with third-party evidence to choose models for coding, reasoning, and professional work.
| 1 | Sep 22, 2026 | 100%27 items | 78.3 | |
| 2 | Sep 28, 2026 | 100%27 items | 75.2 | |
| 3 | Sep 3, 2026 | 100%27 items | 74.7 | |
| 4 | Sep 30, 2026 | 100%27 items | 73.3 | |
| 5 | Sep 1, 2026 | 97%26 items | 72.8 | |
| 6 | Oct 8, 2026 | 100%27 items | 71.5 | |
| 7 | Jul 24, 2026 | 97%26 items | 67.4 | |
| 8 | Sep 22, 2026 | 94%25 items | 65.2 | |
| 9 | Oct 26, 2026 | 69%18 items | 64.9 | |
| 10 | Jun 9, 2026 | 83%22 items | 64.8 | |
| 11 | Jul 9, 2026 | 92%25 items | 64.2 | |
| 12 | Sep 2, 2026 | 87%24 items | 60.6 | |
| 13 | Oct 7, 2026 | 100%27 items | 60.5 | |
| 14 | Oct 17, 2026 | 81%21 items | 60.5 | |
| 15 | ZAGLM 5.3 | Oct 5, 2026 | 100%27 items | 60.3 |
| 16 | OPGPT-5.5 | Apr 23, 2026 | 74%20 items | 59.8 |
| 17 | XAGrok 4.7 | Sep 21, 2026 | 95%26 items | 59.1 |
| 18 | Sep 2, 2026 | 95%26 items | 59.0 | |
| 19 | Jul 9, 2026 | 91%24 items | 59.0 | |
| 20 | May 28, 2026 | 83%22 items | 58.8 | |
| 21 | XAGrok 4.6 | Aug 12, 2026 | 97%26 items | 58.3 |
| 22 | Aug 3, 2026 | 86%23 items | 57.4 | |
| 23 | Sep 21, 2026 | 78%21 items | 57.2 | |
| 24 | Sep 20, 2026 | 69%19 items | 57.0 | |
| 25 | Sep 10, 2026 | 92%25 items | 56.1 | |
| 26 | MAKimi K3 | Jul 16, 2026 | 97%26 items | 55.6 |
| 27 | Oct 19, 2026 | 58%15 items | 55.1 | |
| 28 | Jun 30, 2026 | 83%22 items | 54.7 | |
| 29 | XAGrok 4.5 | Jul 8, 2026 | 76%20 items | 53.9 |
| 30 | Sep 22, 2026 | 100%27 items | 53.8 | |
| 31 | Aug 13, 2026 | 89%23 items | 53.7 | |
| 32 | Aug 5, 2026 | 70%18 items | 53.6 | |
| 33 | Aug 26, 2026 | 87%24 items | 53.5 | |
| 34 | Jul 9, 2026 | 94%25 items | 52.9 | |
| 35 | Jul 21, 2026 | 74%20 items | 52.9 | |
| 36 | Apr 8, 2026 | 60%16 items | 52.8 | |
| 37 | Jul 31, 2026 | 71%18 items | 52.8 | |
| 38 | ZAGLM-5.2 | Jun 13, 2026 | 71%19 items | 51.4 |
| 39 | Feb 17, 2026 | 71%19 items | 50.1 | |
| 40 | May 21, 2026 | 66%17 items | 49.4 | |
| 41 | Apr 21, 2026 | 68%18 items | 48.9 | |
| 42 | Jun 12, 2026 | 60%15 items | 47.8 | |
| 43 | Apr 22, 2026 | 57%15 items | 47.2 | |
| 44 | XAGrok 4.3 | Apr 17, 2026 | 57%15 items | 46.6 |
| 45 | ZAGLM-5.1 | Apr 7, 2026 | 63%17 items | 46.5 |
| 46 | Mar 17, 2026 | 76%20 items | 46.1 | |
| 47 | Apr 22, 2026 | 44%12 items | 45.8 | |
| 48 | Jun 2, 2026 | 50%14 items | 45.7 | |
| 49 | Jun 1, 2026 | 77%21 items | 44.7 | |
| 50 | Jul 30, 2026 | 79%21 items | 44.3 | |
| 51 | Mar 18, 2026 | 57%15 items | 44.2 | |
| 52 | Jul 21, 2026 | 77%21 items | 43.6 | |
| 53 | TMInkling | Jul 15, 2026 | 86%23 items | 43.4 |
| 54 | Jul 23, 2026 | 44%11 items | 42.8 | |
| 55 | Oct 15, 2025 | 73%19 items | 41.5 |
Not yet ranked
These models have partial scores and will receive a rank when evidence is complete.
| 66.2 | Only one evaluation institution so far · Fewer than 3 coding evaluation types | |
| 64.9 | Fewer than 3 coding evaluation types | |
| 25.0 | Only one evaluation institution so far · Fewer than 3 coding evaluation types · Fewer than 2 reasoning evaluation types · Fewer than 2 professional-work evaluation types · Fewer than 2 knowledge and language evaluation types | |
| 25.0 | Only one evaluation institution so far · Fewer than 3 coding evaluation types · Fewer than 2 reasoning evaluation types · Fewer than 2 professional-work evaluation types · Fewer than 2 knowledge and language evaluation types | |
| 25.0 | Only one evaluation institution so far · Fewer than 3 coding evaluation types · Fewer than 2 reasoning evaluation types · Fewer than 2 professional-work evaluation types · Fewer than 2 knowledge and language evaluation types | |
| 25.0 | Only one evaluation institution so far · Fewer than 3 coding evaluation types · Fewer than 2 reasoning evaluation types · Fewer than 2 professional-work evaluation types · Fewer than 2 knowledge and language evaluation types | |
| 25.0 | Only one evaluation institution so far · Fewer than 3 coding evaluation types · Fewer than 2 reasoning evaluation types · Fewer than 2 professional-work evaluation types · Fewer than 2 knowledge and language evaluation types |